Politics

    • Creating Online harms regulators expected to cost Canada $200 million: PBO

    Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux waits to appear before a committee at the Senate in Ottawa, on Monday, June 3, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Spencer Colby Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux waits to appear before a committee at the Senate in Ottawa, on Monday, June 3, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Spencer Colby
    Share
    OTTAWA -

    Staffing the new regulators in the Liberals' Online Harms Act will cost around $200 million over five years, according to a new analysis released by the Parliamentary Budget Officer on Thursday.  

    The report looks at the federal government's pledge to establish a Digital Safety Commission to regulate social-media companies and force them to limit harmful content online. 

    If the legislation passes in Parliament, that commission would establish a set of regulations and have the power to levy fines against companies that break the rules. 

    The online harms bill also proposes creating a Digital Safety Ombudsperson that Canadians can bring their concerns to, as well as a new Digital Safety Office. 

    In a report released Thursday, the PBO says the Heritage Department estimates those new entities will employ about 300 people when they're fully up and running. 

    "The PBO estimates that from 2024-2025 to 2028-2029 the total operating costs will be $201 million, minus any possible administrative monetary penalties, fines … or regulatory charges collected by the commission, ombudsperson and office," it reads. 

    The report notes the government may collect revenue by fining companies that don't comply, but the estimated costing does not include an analysis of what that could look like. 

    "There is a high degree of uncertainty in the revenues that will be generated since it depends on the willingness of outside enterprises to follow the requirements set out by the commission and the Online Harms Act." 

    Costs may also be higher if the new entities decide to use outside consulting services or legal support, the report says. 

    The watchdog notes that the government's staffing estimates are based on other Canadian and international regulators.

    Justice Minister Arif Virani introduced the online harms bill in February, saying social-media giants must take accountability for harmful content.

    But the Opposition Conservatives have been critical, saying it will accomplish nothing more than create a new bureaucracy. 

    Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner requested the PBO analysis on the costs that would be involved in setting up the new system.

    She has argued the government could instead modify existing laws and regulators to ensure Canadians are better protected online. 

    "The Liberals' controversial legislation has received significant criticism from concerned Canadians and raised alarm amongst legal experts and civil rights advocates," she said in a statement. 

    "Now we learn Trudeau will spend over $200 million of taxpayers' money on his useless 330 person censorship bureaucracy instead of using that money to hire police, protect Canadians and lock up criminals." 

    The party also sent out an email blast to supporters asking them to help Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre defeat what it called the "three-headed monster" — or a trio of Liberal bills that seek to regulate tech giants. 

    In addition to the proposed online harms bill, the Liberal government has laws on the books that regulate online streaming services and social-media platforms that display Canadian news content. 

    Poilievre often accuses Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of censorship in reference to those bills, while the Liberals say the Tories are guilty of peddling misinformation about what the legislation actually does.

    Virani's office has not yet responded to a request for comment about Thursday's costing analysis.

    The file landed on his desk after being previously assigned to the Canadian Heritage minister, years after Trudeau first promised to legislate against online harms during the 2019 election campaign.

    Experts widely panned a consultation paper released around the time of the 2021 federal vote, which proposed a 24-hour takedown rule for content flagged as harmful — an approach they said risked censoring legal content and chilling free speech. 

    That feedback prompted the government to return to the drawing board and assemble a new expert advisory group. 

    The current bill has prompted criticism by civil society advocates and legal experts over its criminal justice reforms, which include proposing stiffer sentences for hate-related crimes and reinstating a controversial section of the Canadian Human Rights Act that would allow Canadians to lodge complaints about hate speech. 

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 4, 2024.

    IN DEPTH

    Opinion

    opinion

    opinion Don Martin: How a beer break may have doomed the carbon tax hike

    When the Liberal government chopped a planned beer excise tax hike to two per cent from 4.5 per cent and froze future increases until after the next election, says political columnist Don Martin, it almost guaranteed a similar carbon tax move in the offing.

    CTVNews.ca Top Stories

    Canada

    World

    Politics

    Health

    Sci-Tech

    Entertainment

    Business

    Lifestyle

    Sports

    Autos

    Local Spotlight

    Vancouver

    Toronto

    Calgary

    Ottawa

    Montreal

    Edmonton

    Atlantic

    Winnipeg

    Regina

    Kitchener

    Saskatoon

    Northern Ontario

    London

    Barrie

    Windsor

    Vancouver Island

    Kelowna

    Lethbridge

    Sault Ste. Marie

    N.L.

    Stay Connected
    Follow CTV News